RadioFM Pro Editorial and Corrections Policy

Editorial purpose

RadioFM Pro publishes listening guides that help a reader move from a specific question to a usable station discovery path. A guide must have a distinct intent, useful source evidence, and a clear boundary between directory facts and editorial guidance.

Evidence and attribution

Station records come from Radio Browser. Place reference data comes from GeoNames. Claims about a broadcaster, current schedule, ownership, or programme are attributed to a reliable official source when they are included. A public tag, click count, vote count, or source-health flag is never presented as an official audience measurement or permanent quality score.

Source limitations are placed near the relevant claim when practical. The source methodology explains field-level confidence and synchronization.

Dates and freshness

“Catalog updated” describes the most recent completed station synchronization. “Editorially reviewed” describes a material human or controlled editorial review of the guide. “Last checked” describes a stream or source check. These dates are not interchangeable and are not advanced merely to make a page appear fresh.

Location claims

RadioFM Pro rejects the zero-latitude and zero-longitude sentinel pair. A city relationship requires a coordinate within the accepted city distance or an exact supplied place-name match inside the same country. When evidence is weak, only the country is shown and no city-level claim or structured data is produced.

Paid placement and conflicts

RadioFM Pro does not sell placement in its editorial guides or label paid exposure as an independent ranking. If sponsorship or commercial placement is introduced, it must be clearly disclosed and kept separate from directory ordering and editorial recommendations.

Corrections

Reports are reviewed against the current directory record and an available official source. Material corrections should update the affected fact and its review date. Unverifiable claims remain absent.

Submit a correction through the contact page with the page URL, disputed statement, proposed correction, and supporting source.